Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Re: [CROMA] (unknown)

 

Wonderful judgement.Akhil ji.............Parents wont expect money from you but they expect love & respect.

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:07 PM, 75chhabra@gmail.com [CrossingsRepublikOwnersAndMembersAssociation-CROMA] <CrossingsRepublikOwnersAndMembersAssociation-CROMA@yahoogroups.co.in> wrote:
 


A son can reside in a self-acquired property of his parents so long as they desire and cannot claim a legal right to stay there, irrespective of his marital status, ruled the Delhi High Court in its latest judgment. 

Justice Pratibha Rani expressly stated, "Where the house is a self-acquired house of the parents, a son, whether married or unmarried, has no legal right to live in that house and he can live in that house only at the mercy of his parents up to the time the parents allow." The judge remarked that it is out of love and affection that the son is allowed to reside in his parents' household and not as a matter of right and stated, 'Merely because the parents have allowed him to live in the house so long as his relations with the parents were cordial, does not mean that the parents have to bear his burden throughout his life.'

In the case in point, the parents had filed a suit seeking eviction of their sons and daughters-in-law from their self-owned property. They claimed that they had allowed their sons to put up with their spouses in two top floors out of love and affection. With the passage of time, however, they alleged that their sons as well their wives 'made their life hell' and they were, hence, forced to issue public notices on 5th January, 2007, and 17th May, 2012, disowning their sons and debarring them from their self-acquired property. They filed a suit seeking a decree of mandatory injunction directing them to vacate the floors in their possession.

The sons, however, denied the allegations and contended that they were the co-owners of the property as they had contributed towards its purchase and construction. The trial court, however, decreed in favour of the parents, which was challenged by the sons in the high court. The court dismissed the claim and held that the petitioners had failed to prove their co-ownership in the suit property and the parents had amply proven that the property belonged to them through documentary


The above is for your knowledge and information to be careful in future with your parents , if you are staying in self acquired property of your parents.  

Always must love and respect your parents

Best Regards

Akhil P.Chhabra
Advocate
B024





--
Thanks & Regards
Robin Tiwari

__._,_.___
Posted by: Robin Tiwari <tiwari.robin@gmail.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a new topic • Messages in this topic (2)
For latest updates do visit official CROMA website at:
http://www.croma.org.in

Also, do register at the CROMA site, if not done already:
http://www.croma.org.in/member-registration/

[IMP: People posting ads for promotion of their business or of commercial-only nature will be banned/unsubscribed without any warning or clarification]

.

__,_._,___
Posted by GD

[CROMA] (unknown)

 


A son can reside in a self-acquired property of his parents so long as they desire and cannot claim a legal right to stay there, irrespective of his marital status, ruled the Delhi High Court in its latest judgment. 

Justice Pratibha Rani expressly stated, "Where the house is a self-acquired house of the parents, a son, whether married or unmarried, has no legal right to live in that house and he can live in that house only at the mercy of his parents up to the time the parents allow." The judge remarked that it is out of love and affection that the son is allowed to reside in his parents' household and not as a matter of right and stated, 'Merely because the parents have allowed him to live in the house so long as his relations with the parents were cordial, does not mean that the parents have to bear his burden throughout his life.'

In the case in point, the parents had filed a suit seeking eviction of their sons and daughters-in-law from their self-owned property. They claimed that they had allowed their sons to put up with their spouses in two top floors out of love and affection. With the passage of time, however, they alleged that their sons as well their wives 'made their life hell' and they were, hence, forced to issue public notices on 5th January, 2007, and 17th May, 2012, disowning their sons and debarring them from their self-acquired property. They filed a suit seeking a decree of mandatory injunction directing them to vacate the floors in their possession.

The sons, however, denied the allegations and contended that they were the co-owners of the property as they had contributed towards its purchase and construction. The trial court, however, decreed in favour of the parents, which was challenged by the sons in the high court. The court dismissed the claim and held that the petitioners had failed to prove their co-ownership in the suit property and the parents had amply proven that the property belonged to them through documentary


The above is for your knowledge and information to be careful in future with your parents , if you are staying in self acquired property of your parents.  

Always must love and respect your parents

Best Regards

Akhil P.Chhabra
Advocate
B024


__._,_.___
Posted by: 75chhabra@gmail.com
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a new topic • Messages in this topic (1)
For latest updates do visit official CROMA website at:
http://www.croma.org.in

Also, do register at the CROMA site, if not done already:
http://www.croma.org.in/member-registration/

[IMP: People posting ads for promotion of their business or of commercial-only nature will be banned/unsubscribed without any warning or clarification]

.

__,_._,___
Posted by GD

[CROMA] Declare ‘Sardar Jokes As “Racial Slur” And Treat It As Ragging : SGPC To Supreme Court

 

The Shiromani Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee ( SGPC) , the apex body representing the Sikh community in suggestions filed before Supreme Court hearing a PIL for banning 'sardar jokes' has demanded that such jokes which actually amount to "racial slur" and "racial profiling" be included within the definition of 'ragging' in educational institutions. 

The SGPC said such jokes are very rampantly used in schools, colleges and university campuses by students to taunt students belonging to the Sikh community. 

"The Ministry of Human Resource Development be directed to issue appropriate instructions in respect to schools, colleges, universities and other educational institutions wherein in accordance with the Raghavan Committee report "ragging" has been banned by setting forth guidelines for the same, and in keeping with the fact that victimization of students in such institutions on the basis of race and community falling nothing short of ragging, the same must be brought under the banner of ragging and suitable amendments be made in the purview/definition of ragging so as to include such "racial slurs", "racial profiling", "objectification on the basis of belonging to a particular community", said the suggestions filed by the SGPC on the directions of a bench headed by chief justice T S Thakur. 

The PIL seeks a ban on sardar jokes-both print and online- which portray Sikhs as "persons of low intellect, stupid and foolish". 

Holding that such a step will "bolster the pride and self-esteem of youngsters belonging to the Sardar community, and preserve the Sikh identity", the body said "since curbing of such jokes and comments on the basis of physical appearance alone, would reduce the number of young Sikh boys who otherwise under peer pressure and to save themselves from such objectification choose the route of getting their hair cut, which ultimately results in loss of identity of the Sikh religion in the very country of its origin." 

The SGPC told the court: "The brunt of this situation is faced by young school and college going children, who are at an impressionable age. The same holds especially true for Sikh boys who adorn unshorn hair, and tie patkas(mini head scarf), or turbans(head gear), and just by virtue of adorning the symbols of their religion become the victims of mean jokes and insinuations which can emotionally scar them for life.

 Increasing number of youngsters belonging to the community are now either cutting their hair or tonsuring in order to be accepted in their peer group or to escape from ridicule, said the SGPC. Pointing out that it did not want Sikhs to be ridiculed, SC had in March this year for the first time asked the community to come out with suggestions as to what could be done within the permitted jurisdiction of the judiciary to impose limited ban on 'sardar' jokes.

 "Of course we do not want you to be ridiculed, but please tell us in what way we can do something. You come out with suggestions", a bench headed by Chief Justice TS Thakur had during a July hearing told lawyers who represented SGPC, Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee (DSGMC) and main petitioner and advocate Harvinder Chowdhury asking them to come up with suggestions. 

DSGMC's lawyer R S Suri however said he was not for any penal provision, but primarily wanted sensitisation of the public, especially the school students on the issue. 

While Chowdhury demanded a ban on websites spreading jokes portraying the 'sardar' community as "persons of low intellect, stupid and foolish" and equated them to "racial abuse", the DSGMC sought "framing the guidelines to curb the menace of the social, racial, religious, ethnic remarks abuses or jokes and direction to the state to implement some guidelines through their law-enforcing agencies at all the public places".

 "Certain type of jokes becoming viral after the advent of the social media, WhatsApp, some of which are in very bad taste are hurting us. It is not only against the Sikhs. There is a wider canvas like Biharis, people from the North-east also are the butt of many jokes. We may be enjoying jokes and also cracking jokes ourselves. But we do not want to become jokes ourselves," Suri argued

The above is for your knowledge and information to be careful in future for sharing such Santa Banta jokes   

Best Regards

Akhil P.Chhabra
Advocate
B024


__._,_.___
Posted by: Akhil Pal Chhabra <75chhabra@gmail.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a new topic • Messages in this topic (1)
For latest updates do visit official CROMA website at:
http://www.croma.org.in

Also, do register at the CROMA site, if not done already:
http://www.croma.org.in/member-registration/

[IMP: People posting ads for promotion of their business or of commercial-only nature will be banned/unsubscribed without any warning or clarification]

.

__,_._,___
Posted by GD

[CROMA] National Anthem Must Before Movies In Theatres: says Supreme Court

 

The Supreme Court today made it mandatory for all cinema theatres to play the national anthem before a movie begins during which the national flag is to be shown on the screen.

A bench of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Amitava Roy also said that everyone present in cinema hall should rise up and pay respect to the anthem when it is played.

Acting on a public interest litigation filed by one Shyam Narayan Chouski hailing from Bhopal complaining of misuse of the anthem in TV shows or movies, the court also ruled that it should not be commercially exploited or dramatized. "When the national anthem is played it is imperative for everyone to show honour and respect It would instill a sense of committed patriotism and nationalism," it said. 

"Time has come for people to realise that the national anthem is a symbol of constitutional patriotism…people must feel they live in a nation and this individually perceived notion of freedom must go…people must feel this is my country, my motherland." Justice Misra said. 

It was mandatory for cinema halls to play the national anthem after every movie in the 1960s. The practice faded away over the years, as multiplexes dramatically changed the movie-watching experience. In 2003, Maharashtra had ordered that the anthem has to be played before the screening of any film. 

"The national anthem must not be printed on any undesirable object, and should not be used for any commercial purposes. Also, no dramatisation of the anthem should be allowed", the court said also asking asked the government to specify what would constitute disrespect to it and its abuse. 


The court also ruled that the National Anthem cannot be commercially exploited to gain financial advantage or benefit. "it cannot be introduced or used as part of any entertainment program or variety show", said the bench. 

The Centre for its part agreed to circulate the order to all States' Chief Secretaries and also to publish it in electronic and print media. 

The petition, referring to the provisions of the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 and also alleged that the national anthem was sung in various circumstances which were not permissible. 

The PIL sought directions that the national anthem should be played in cinema halls across the country before a film begins and proper norms and protocol be fixed regarding its playing and singing at official functions and the programmes where constitutional dignitaries are present


Copy of today order from court room attached for your knowledge and info   


Best Regards

Akhil P.Chhabra
Advocate 
B024


__._,_.___
Posted by: Akhil Pal Chhabra <75chhabra@gmail.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a new topic • Messages in this topic (1)
For latest updates do visit official CROMA website at:
http://www.croma.org.in

Also, do register at the CROMA site, if not done already:
http://www.croma.org.in/member-registration/

[IMP: People posting ads for promotion of their business or of commercial-only nature will be banned/unsubscribed without any warning or clarification]

.

__,_._,___
Posted by GD

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

[CROMA] Fw: 3 BHK Available for Rent / Sale

 



Hi,

A new 3 BHK (1650 sq ft) is available for rent
features:

Wooden wardrobes and modular kitchen,
Grilled doors and the main balcony,
Bigger and spacious balconies in all rooms,
Bright rooms abundant Sunlight from morning to evening,
Separate dressing room in Master,
All electric fittings RO,
Covered parking,
12th floor facing park.

Please let me know (og.tech79@gmail.com) if anyone is interested.

Regards,
Vasudha


__._,_.___
Posted by: aaq aa <aazhi89@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a new topic • Messages in this topic (1)
For latest updates do visit official CROMA website at:
http://www.croma.org.in

Also, do register at the CROMA site, if not done already:
http://www.croma.org.in/member-registration/

[IMP: People posting ads for promotion of their business or of commercial-only nature will be banned/unsubscribed without any warning or clarification]

.

__,_._,___
Posted by GD

Friday, November 25, 2016

[CROMA] Exotica Eastern Court - Affordable rent - Ist Floor/3 BHK/Pool,Garden,Road Facing/1685 SQF

 

Exotica Eastern Court/ Crossing Republic/ Please text/whatsapp me on this number and I will call back
NINE 8 SEVEN THREE 5 1 ZERO TWO THREE FOUR
Amit

__._,_.___
Posted by: Amit Kumar <kumaramitg@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a new topic • Messages in this topic (1)
For latest updates do visit official CROMA website at:
http://www.croma.org.in

Also, do register at the CROMA site, if not done already:
http://www.croma.org.in/member-registration/

[IMP: People posting ads for promotion of their business or of commercial-only nature will be banned/unsubscribed without any warning or clarification]

.

__,_._,___
Posted by GD

[CROMA] car pool from Crossings to dwarka sector 7 ,New Delhi

 

Hi,

Anyone interested in car pooling from Crossings to dwarka sector 7 ,new delhi , space is available, I leave Crossings at between 8 /8.30 Am and back from office at 7PM. Contact me @ 9811897214, if interested.

Regards
Vijay chandel

__._,_.___
Posted by: vijay chandel <chandel_vijay@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a new topic • Messages in this topic (1)
For latest updates do visit official CROMA website at:
http://www.croma.org.in

Also, do register at the CROMA site, if not done already:
http://www.croma.org.in/member-registration/

[IMP: People posting ads for promotion of their business or of commercial-only nature will be banned/unsubscribed without any warning or clarification]

.

__,_._,___
Posted by GD

Thursday, November 24, 2016

[CROMA] 2 BHK on Rent @GH07, Crossing Republik

 

Hi All,

2 BHK (Newly painted) on 2nd Floor in Tower 2 on Rent at GH07, Crosssing Republik, Ghaziabad. Here is the details:

1). Full esthetic Woodwork in Bedrooms, Kitchen and Living Room

   2). Newly Painted 

3). Curtain Rods

4). RO

5). Covered Car Parking

6). Fans and Lights

7). Power backup

8). Iron gate etc

Available for move in immediately. Interested in Family only. Rent 10000 + maintenance.

Regards,
Rahul Singhal

+91-9711780028


__._,_.___
Posted by: Rahul Singhal <meetrs@gmail.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a new topic • Messages in this topic (1)
For latest updates do visit official CROMA website at:
http://www.croma.org.in

Also, do register at the CROMA site, if not done already:
http://www.croma.org.in/member-registration/

[IMP: People posting ads for promotion of their business or of commercial-only nature will be banned/unsubscribed without any warning or clarification]

.

__,_._,___
Posted by GD

[CROMA] 2 BHK (1000 sqft) flat is available

 



Hi,

2 BHK (1000 sqft) flat is available in Supertech Livingston, Crossongs Republik for rent with the following features:

- Fully Furnished with beds in both rooms and refrigrater.
- Wooden wardrobes and modular kitchen.
- Grilled doors and the main balcony.
- Bigger and spacious balconies in all rooms.
- Abundant Sunlight from morning to evening.
- All electric fittings with Geyser, RO.
- Covered car parking.
- 15th floor facing park and temple.
- Rent 10,000 + Maintenance.

Please call / text me if anyone is interested. Broker please excuse.

Regards,

Jayant Gupta
Mobile: 8130339509
Email: jayant_gpt@yahoo.co.in

__._,_.___
Posted by: Jayant Kumar <jayant_gpt@yahoo.co.in>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a new topic • Messages in this topic (2)
For latest updates do visit official CROMA website at:
http://www.croma.org.in

Also, do register at the CROMA site, if not done already:
http://www.croma.org.in/member-registration/

[IMP: People posting ads for promotion of their business or of commercial-only nature will be banned/unsubscribed without any warning or clarification]

.

__,_._,___
Posted by GD

[CROMA] 2 BHK (1000 sqft) flat is available

 

Hi,

2 BHK (1000 sqft) flat is available in Supertech Livingston, Crossongs Republik for rent with the following features:

- Fully Furnished with beds in both rooms and refrigrater.
- Wooden wardrobes and modular kitchen.
- Grilled doors and the main balcony.
- Bigger and spacious balconies in all rooms.
- Abundant Sunlight from morning to evening.
- All electric fittings with Geyser, RO.
- Covered car parking.
- 15th floor facing park and temple.
- Rent 10,000 + Maintenance.

Please call / text me if anyone is interested. Broker please excuse.

Regards,

Jayant Gupta
Mobile: 8130339509
Email: jayant_gpt@yahoo.co.in

__._,_.___
Posted by: Jayant Kumar <jayant_gpt@yahoo.co.in>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a new topic • Messages in this topic (1)
For latest updates do visit official CROMA website at:
http://www.croma.org.in

Also, do register at the CROMA site, if not done already:
http://www.croma.org.in/member-registration/

[IMP: People posting ads for promotion of their business or of commercial-only nature will be banned/unsubscribed without any warning or clarification]

.

__,_._,___
Posted by GD
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)